Monday, January 19, 2009

He Shines in All That's Fair, So Lighten Up

Christians have had a long and conflicted relationship with culture. And there has always been a segment of Christians who believe that involvement in the culture is a dangerous business, for it dances close to the line of embracing things that might be displeasing to God. Hear me out: our world is flawed, and there are some dangerous elements to the culture, but is withdrawing from the culture and forming a separate sub-culture really the answer? On the other hand, is targeting the culture and trying to "save" it something the Bible advocates? If you answered yes to either one of these questions I want to pose something for you to consider: It is interesting that those who object to Santa Claus are often the very ones who live by his creed: you better watch out. . . you better be good. . . It's also interesting that those who speak against being "of the world" often base their lifestyle convictions not on Scripture but on the culture itself: dress up to go to church. . . sing mostly traditional hymns without drums. . . believe that the earth is very young. . . don't support public schools (Yes, those are merely preferences of a specific segment of the culture. They are not biblical commands. The same could be said of drinking in moderation, reading novels that may have an occasional explitive, and watching movies that don't involve Bible characters, people being left behind, and cartoon vegetables who botch the point of the story of Jonah).

Lest you think I am attacking those convictions or the people who hold them, let me clearly state: there is nothing wrong with holding and practicing such convictions. In fact, everyone is free to do so, as long as they are acknowledged as personal preferences and not biblical requirements.

My point is this: When we expect others to live by our preferences, and act as if they will be more godly if they do, we have crossed the line into absurdity by attempting to take the place of God.

C.S. Lewis put it this way:

"One of the marks of a certain type of bad man is that he cannot give up a thing himself without wanting everyone else to give it up. That is not the Christian way. An individual Christian may see fit to give up all sorts of things for special reasons-- marriage, or meat, or beer, or the cinema; but the moment he starts saying the things are bad in themselves, or looking down his nose at other people who do use them, he has taken the wrong turning."

Christians throughout the ages have believed that God makes himself known in two ways: Generally (through nature and all that exists, which reveals to us the beautiful artwork of God according to Psalm 19:1-6) and Specifically (through the Bible, which reveals to us the truth of God's redeeming love in Jesus Christ according to Psalm 19:7-14). Here's what intrigues me: We go to great lengths to argue that the entire Bible, God's specific revelation, is "inerrant" (which I strongly believe with every fiber of my being). I'm curious though, have you ever heard anyone argue that God's general revelation is inerrant? The fact is, if God chose to reveal himself this way it HAS TO BE inerrant. It is, however, harder to interpret, and therein lies the tragedy: Because the light of nature (which includes many aspects of the culture itself) is often harder to understand and interpret than the Bible, we would rather not take the time to try and interpret it. In other words, we don't want to think, so we simply erect barriers that forbid entrance into anything that seems popular in modern culture, for fear that those things might contain sinful elements. We would rather discourage people from watching Friends and Seinfeld because they are "worldy" shows that sometimes deal with immoral subjects, rather than celebrate and learn from the amazing sense of community those shows portray-- a type of community which Christians long to have but seldom find in the very place where it is supposed to be found: the church. We would rather discourage people from going trick-or-treating on Halloween rather than remove our own religious costumes that conceal our sin to others the other 364 days of the year.

Why do we spend so much time being uptight and offended at trivial matters such as what kind of music is godly, how many winter coats a person should have (something I recently heard someone debating), and whether or not Christians should read Harry Potter? The old hymn states, "This is my Father's World, He shines in all that's fair. In the rustling grass I hear Him pass, He speaks to me everywhere".

He's shining on you, my friend, so lighten up.

6 comments:

  1. I will follow you blog. It is very inspirational

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very refreshing to hear this. It is sad that we have become so self righteous and judgemental toward others by adding our own "personal preferences" to the Gospel.

    I really appreciate the Cup full of Conversation. I sometimes feel I learn more here than in adult sunday school classes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Dale,

    I just finished Andy Crouch's new book Culture Making. I think you'd like it.

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Dale..
    I love your blog! I really enjoyed reading this last post. I have a question for ya...how did you get the picture at the top of your blog? I have a blog too (with blog spot too actually) and I want to put a picture at the top like you did, but I can't quite figure out how to go about doing it! Alright, just thought I'd ask!

    Beth Alleman

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dale,
    I understand your reasoning and agree with most of it, but as Christians we are to look on holy, righteous, praiseworthy things (paraphrase Philippians 4:7-9) and we are to learn from God's Word and from each other. What can we learn from the World and its practices, other than how sinful we can be and are already?
    We are justified by Gods saving grace but the rest of our life we live on this earth we are to be sanctified, working out our salvation with fear and trembling. How is taking part in the activities you mentioned above supposed to glorify God or grow us in righteousness?
    I agree with you that we should not isolate ourselves from the world and we should not press our personal convictions on others, but we must protect ourselves and our children. Everyone has different propensities to sin so each person must put up barriers to protect themselves in areas that others may not, but if a barrier is healthy for one person, it should be healthy for another person, not to say that the other person is wrong for not putting up the same barrier.
    It is not a command, it is just good practice to protect our eyes, ears, and minds from the things of this world.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I find the comment from Suskifamily to be interesting for this reason: As a parent of young children, I certainly understand the desire to protect our children from danger and from evil influences. But the thing I am completely unable to shelter them from is the sin in their own hearts, as well as the evil example set for them by their parents and siblings. I witnessed my own 3 month old daughter as she let out numerous screams in order to have her older sister be scolded. She smiled broadly and repeatedly when Sophia was reprimanded. Again, she was 3 months old! She had barely been out of our home and certainly had not been taught this behavior; it was from her own dark heart.

    It's tempting to blame our children's sin (and our own) on what some call "an increasingly sinful society" (remember, earth's 2nd generation included a murderer, and the 10th generation was so wicked that God destroyed all but one family), but if we're honest, we sin because we ourselves are sinners. How do we protect our eyes, ears and minds from ourselves?

    ReplyDelete